Teaching Decision Analysis: Enhancing Student Comprehension through the Class Preparation Picker Technique
Main Article Content
Research
Decision Analysis, education, curriculum, experiential learning
Abstract
The academic discipline of decision sciences, integral to systems engineering, management, and business, faces a challenge in effective pedagogy due to overly complex or overly simplistic course examples. As a result, students either do not understand or do not appreciate the usefulness of the course material. This paper proposes the Class Preparation Picker technique, which allows students to apply the course material to the making of a complex decision – whether or not to complete their homework. This technique uses a lottery that consists of tickets that contain each student’s name. If a student’s name is drawn, their homework is collected and graded. If the homework is satisfactory, the lottery receives a ticket that requires no one to submit their homework. Alternatively, if the homework is unsatisfactory, the lottery receives a ticket that requires everyone to submit their homework. This lottery was implemented in a senior-level decision analysis course. Over the course of the semester, students realized that they were making a hard decision and started to apply the techniques taught in the class to support their decision making. This experiential decision-making process increased the student’s appreciation for decision analysis, while also encouraging students to better prepare for class.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.
References
Chickering AW (1977) Experience and learning. an introduction to experiential learning. .
Clemen R, Reilly T (2014) Making Hard Decisions with DecisionTools (Mason, OH: Cengage Learning).
Gao P (2008) Keynesian beauty contest, accounting disclosure, and market efficiency. Journal of Accounting Research 46(4):785–807.
Gentry JW (1990) What is experiential learning. Guide to business gaming and experiential learning 9:20.
Griffiths HB (1983) Simplification and complexity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics 297–317.
Grossman R (2009) Structures for facilitating student reflection. College teaching 57(1):15–22.
Herremans IM, Murch R (2003) Multidisciplinary decision making through experiential learning: Perspectives from practical trials. Innovative higher education 28:63–83.
Howard R, Abbas A (2016) Foundations of Decision Analysis (Boston: Pearson).
Karmann A, Lehmann-Waffenschmidt M (2001) High order strategic thinking: The subscriber’s dilemma in an experimental stock issuing and the Keynesian beauty contest. Advances in Behavioral Economics: Essays in Honor of Horst Todt, 191–207 (Springer).
Kochenderfer M (2015) Decision Making Under Uncertainty (Cambridge: MIT Press).
Kolb DA (2014) Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (FT press).
Krauss S, Wang X (2003) The psychology of the Monty hall problem: Discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1) 3–22.
McCarthy M, et al. (2010) Experiential learning theory: From theory to practice. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER) 8(5).
Parnell G, Bresnick T, Tani S, Johnson E (2013) Handbook of Decision Analysis (Hoboken: Wiley). Savage S (2003) Decision Making with Insight (Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole).
Sharlanova V (2004) Experiential learning. Trakia Journal of Sciences 2(4):36–39.
How to Cite
