Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar
ISER
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 11 No. 1-2 (2023): Industrial and Systems Engineering Review - GDRKMCC23 Special Issue
  4. Articles

Improving Infrastructure Budget Allocation with Lean Six Sigma

Main Article Content

Justin Evenson
Christian Rieger
Cole Truex
Liam Wilderoter
Nathan Hedgecock
PDF

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2023v11i1-2.pp73-78

Issue section:

Research

Keywords:

Lean Six Sigma, DMAIC Process, Budget Analysis

Abstract

The U.S. Army’s Chemical Biological Center (CBC) is a research and development center for chemical defense that operates out of Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), MD. Aberdeen Proving Ground is an aging installation that requires significant infrastructure maintenance and improvement. Currently, the CBC’s infrastructure sustainment process is running above budget and behind schedule. As a result of process inefficiencies, $105M of priority infrastructure projects were unfunded in FY2021. This paper uses Lean Six Sigma, a process improvement methodology, to analyze process inefficiencies within the CBC’s service order process. The paper makes a series of recommendations to reduce costs and errors in the service order process, allowing the CBC to execute more of its currently unfunded projects.

Abstract 390 | PDF Downloads 8
  • About
  • References
  • Related
  • Citation

Article Sidebar

Authors
Justin Evenson
Christian Rieger
Cole Truex
Liam Wilderoter
Nathan Hedgecock
Published
December 1, 2023

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 11 No. 1-2 (2023): Industrial and Systems Engineering Review - GDRKMCC23 Special Issue
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.

References

George, M. L. (2004). Lean Six Sigma Pocket ToolBook. Manhatten: Mcgraw-Hill .
Hwang, Y.-D. (2006). The practices of Integrating Manufacturing Execution System and Six Sigma Sethodology. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 761-768.
Jacobson, G. (2017, May). An Introduction to Process Control Charts. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from KaiNexus: https://blog.kainexus.com/improvement-disciplines/lean/control-charts/an-introduction-to-process-control-charts
Jiju Antony, R. S. (2017). Lean Six Sigma: yesterday, today and tomorrow. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management , 1073-1093.
Lokkerbol, J. d. (2012). An analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC Method From The Terspective of Problem Solving. International Journal of Production Economics, 604-614.
Lyu, M. C. (2009). A Lean Six-Sigma Approach to Touch Panel Quality Improvement. Production, Planing & Control: The Management of Operations, 445-454.
Montgomery, D. C. (2008). Overview of Six Sigma. JSTOR, 329-346.
Onesource, M. (n.d.). Aberdeen Proving Ground In-Depth Overview. Retrieved from militaryonesource.mil: https://installations.militaryonesource.mil/in-depth-overview/aberdeen-proving-ground
Tanjuakio, Kelvin. (2017). Retrieved from “DMAIC - The 5 Phases of Lean Six Sigma”: https://goleansixsigma.com/dmaic-five-basic-phases-of-lean-six-sigma/
Three Tools of the Six Sigma Define Phase of DMAIC. (2022, Septemeber 9). Villanova University.
Villanova University. (2021, September 27). Three Tools of the Six Sigma Define Phase of DMAIC. Retrieved from villanovau: https://www.villanovau.com/resources/six-sigma/six-sigma-define-phase-dmaic/

How to Cite

Improving Infrastructure Budget Allocation with Lean Six Sigma. (2023). Industrial and Systems Engineering Review, 11(1-2), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2023v11i1-2.pp73-78
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • IEEE
  • MLA
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
How to Cite
Improving Infrastructure Budget Allocation with Lean Six Sigma. (2023). Industrial and Systems Engineering Review, 11(1-2), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2023v11i1-2.pp73-78
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
Archives About Submissions Contact

ISSN 2329-0188

connect with us
on social media

Modal Header